DSC_0493 copy

Meet the Orange San Diego, a new Android phone that’s exclusive to the network. It’s the final, shipping name of the Orange Santa Clara phone that we profiled back in February. While we normally like to stress that it’s the software that counts these days, and not the hardware, it’s the silicon inside this phone that’s significant.

You see, this is the first phone in Europe to ever sport an Intel chip. The big beast of desktop computing has finally persuaded somebody to use its new mobile chip, so there’s a lot riding on this smartphone. Let’s take a look.

Design

We don’t think Gigabyte, the manufacturer of the Orange San Diego, will take too much offence when we say that it’s a pretty boring looking phone. It’s just a black slab with rounded edges and a metal trim, a bit like the iPhone 4/4S.

Best Android apps of all time: Top 100

It’s a bit pedestrian, with a lot of stuff going on around the edges, lines here, holes there, speaker grilles there. But it is firm, the matte black back panel is smooth to hold, there’s no sign of creaking, and it’s not missing anything: there’s a camera button, and even a HDMI-out port on the left hand side.

The 4.03-inch display itself is bright with broad viewing angles, and fairly sharp, given its 1024×600 resolution. In case you’re wondering, yes, that’s a really bloody weird resolution for a smartphone. Fortunately, we haven’t seen any problems in terms of app support: your lay user won’t notice between this and more typical 960×540 displays found on Android phones.

Software

The Orange San Diego runs Android, but it’s a very, very orange version of it. Literally: the default homescreen is orange. But the homescreen and menu system (or “launcher” as it’s known) is also an Orange creation, and we’re in two minds about it.

On the plus side, there’s little evidence of lag, one of our main gripes with Orange’s modifications in the past. And its smart gestures really are smart. On the homescreen, you can launch any app or shortcut you choose by drawing a letter that you specify: it works flawlessly, and is very fast.

On the downside, there’s a bit of bloatware on board, including Navigon (Don’t bother unless you’re travelling abroad, Google Maps Navigation is free), and the Dailymotion video app, which is a poor man’s YouTube. We wouldn’t mind so much but that you can’t uninstall them, which is a bit heavy handed on Orange’s part. Like salting the earth.

It needs hardly saying that Android itself is amazing. It’s not as hard to use as people like to say, and there are hundreds of thousands of apps on the Google Play store to make the Orange San Diego do almost anything. Anything that is, except run Android 4.0 just yet.

You see, the Orange San Diego is running Android 2.3, a now 18 month old version of Google’s mobile operating system. That’s a massive faux pas when Android 4.0 is more than half a year old itself now. This latest version of Android packs some crucial enhancements, including a massive redesign, a new Gmail app and support for the excellent Android Chrome browser.

Orange says an Android 4.0 update is on the way, but it’s like we’ve always said: you should never ever buy a phone based on what it will do in the future, rather than what it does now. Just because a company says that it will provide an update, it does not follow. The road to hell is paved with good intentions: just look at Motorola.

Performance

We can take or leave the eight megapixel camera on the Orange San Diego. The results are average, although it is nice to see full HD video recording is an option. Call quality is perfectly acceptable: let’s skip straight to what everyone wants to know. What’s it like to use an Intel phone?

Surprisingly normal, is the answer. Other than the logo popping up on the boot screen, you won’t notice any differences. It doesn’t sweat unicorn tears or make loud angry fan noises: the 1.6GHz Atom Z2460 processor makes the Orange San Diego relatively nippy, but not amazingly so. Try and load a few tabs in the browser and you’ll run into the typical Android slowdown from time to time.

In the Quadrant Standard benchmark test, the phone clocked around 3,700 – that would have been impressive a year ago, but several phones pushing many more pixels have streaked ahead of this now.

This isn’t a speed demon like the Nvidia Tegra 3 chip in the HTC One X, or the Exynos 4212 powerhouse inside the Samsung Galaxy S3. Battery life in practice doesn’t seem to be any different: you’ll get a day’s use of the phone with sync on, but not much more.

Granted, this phone isn’t priced to compete with the top tier, but Intel really needs to hang with the big boys, otherwise why bother? We doubt Intel wants to be known for being inside mediocre mid-range smartphones.

Verdict

Intel’s been making a huge deal out of its mobile efforts for years, but now that it’s actually here, I’m sorry to say it’s more a fizzle than fanfare.

While there’s nothing wrong with Intel’s innards, there’s nothing particularly impressive either. Until Intel inks some bigger deals than Gigabyte (“Who?” we hear you ask) and even Motorola, the likes of Qualcomm, Nvidia and Samsung won’t be losing any sleep just yet.

If you have any sense whatsoever, you’ll buy a phone with Android 4.0 out of the box, like the similarly priced HTC One V (We’re in the process of testing the HTC Desire C at the moment, and rather nice it is too). If you’re after a bargain, the Android 2.3 running Huawei Ascend costs half the price.

We’ll revisit when and if the Orange San Diego gets Android 4.0, but for now not much has changed: Intel has still to make a splash in mobile.

  • http://twitter.com/Patrick_J73 Patrick

    From what i read it can run around 70% of the google markets apps on its x86 core instead of arm, Also from whats about it has around 3/4 the speed of a Galaxy S3. For £200 thats not a bad thing.

    Only problem is Vodafone do the very good Huawei G300, great 4″ phone and runs faster than the £400 iPhone 4 (not s) And it does flash well to for BBC Iplayer etc etc.
    And at least the G300 you can unlock it.

  • Ffs

    the electricpig apple bias still in full effect then:

    “we say that it’s a pretty boring looking phone. It’s just a black slab with rounded edges and a metal trim, a bit like the iPhone 4/4S.”

    but when you were oozing over the iphone4:

    “the iPhone 4 represents a monumental leap in mobile design. It’s innovative, smart, and has looks good enough to stop traffic”

    • Anonymous

      I don’t see what the conflict is there: it’s perfectly possible for something to look like a more boring version of something else, particularly when straight lines and the colour black are involved! Also, we published our iPhone 4 review two years ago – things have changed since then.

  • Rubbish Review

    What exactly is wrong with Android 2.3 other than the fact that it’s old? The functionality of the phone isn’t adversely impaired by not having android 4.0 from the off other than by not having Android Beam – a feature that pretty much nobody has ever used.

    Also, it has an 8mp camera, not a 5mp camera as stated in the review. Granted that makes little difference on its own but the least that could have been said was that it has a multitude of options available. But no, that might be actual journalism.

    And no mention of the fact that it’s basically dual core power for £200, shoots 1080p (can your G300 do that?), has a micro HDMI port, has NFC, etc. But also there is no menti;n of its actual downsides – no expandable storage, no removable battery to name but two. The only criticisms raised in this review are the OS and the design (and on the latter point therr is no mention of the Gorilla glass screen). Again, all that might be actual journalism.

    This review is utterly atrocious as an objective judgement on the phone and personally I’m taking it with not even a pinch of salt. Anyone who is interested in the phone would be wise to seek out a different review.

    • Anonymous

      Hi Rubbish Review (Great name, btw!)

      As someone who’s used scores of Android phones over the years, I can say that Android 4.0 is an enormous leap forward in productivity. The new Google apps (Gmail and the calendar especially) are absolutely superb, as is the new Chrome browser which only runs on ICS. To the point where I wouldn’t consider going back to a 2.3 phone ever again – and wouldn’t recommend anyone else did either.

      Also, you have to consider the phone’s viability going forward: more and more Android 4.0 apps only are going to start appearing, making a phone that doesn’t run it out of the box a bad investment right now. I’ll return to the phone when the update rolls out, but until then, I’ll believe it when I see it.

      Cheers!
      Ben

  • Stok

    Ben Sillis is a total Apple fanboy,then again so is this website

    • Anonymous

      I’m not especially. I don’t own an iPhone. My own phone is a Google Nexus S, which I love to bits. It’s hard to refute Apple’s numbers though: it’s doing so well, it must be doing something right!

      • fahim5130

        The benchmark score is higher than the Galaxy Nexus and the atrix. And yes you are right i was hoping this phone would come running ics, then to update to jellybean.

  • James

    I got this phone last week, as an upgrade from my (terrible) Xperia PLAY.
    So far, I like it. A lot. It’s great value for money, and has a surprisingly good build quality despite Gigabyte being a (as far as I know) relatively unknown company.

    The 8mp camera ( not 5mp, as stated in the article) is alright, but a little bit disappointing; the picture quality is sub-par for an 8mp camera, although the burst function is pretty admirable.
    The display is absolutely fantastic, it’s vibrant, well lit, PACKED with pixels, and it also features Gorilla glass, I think. – Still absolutely no marks on it after the last week. In comparison, my Xperia PLAY was covered in small marks after the first couple of DAYS, and I am not a careless person.
    Some of the stock wallpapers are extremely nice to look at on this screen, especially the Macro-focus style ones, they look great!

    The chip is very good, it gives a smooth ride, and I’ve not seen it lagg out to an extreme extent whilst using apps.
    However, a major gripe I have is that the Homescreen is ALWAYS laggy. I use no widgets whatsoever, and very few icons, and it still has terrible jagged transitions. This doesn’t make sense though, since the rest of the phone is smooth as butter, maybe a future update will resolve this, as I don’t believe it’s a lack of power.
    Orange bloatware is a pain in the ass as well.
    The capacitive buttons at the bottom of the screen give me no problems either, and are reasonably back-lit for darker rooms, or nightime walks etc.
    As well as this, the rubberized rear cover of the phone feels really nice in the hand. and doesn’t slip easily. I like this feature, as I always feel conscious of dropping my phone when it’s a glossy plastic slab, I don’t have that problem here at all.

    unfortunately, I’ve found a few of my favourite apps to be unavailable on this phone as well, due to the Intel chip being different to the ARM structure. Most notably Temple Run and Minecraft Pocket Edition. However, most main stream apps (excluding games) work fine.
    If you were wondering, Fruit Ninja AND Angry Birds work fine on this phone, and both perform fantastically)

    The battery life is fairly decent, and I can safely get a day’s use out of it, with a bit to spare, but it’s no super-endurance affair, as Intel has been tooting about.
    The power button and camera button are both a bit hit and miss, they’re both a bit spongy, and a couple of times, I’ve had to attempt twice to turn the screen off. It’s no big issue though, I think it’s just a case of getting used to the resistance of the buttons.
    The phone also has a NON REMOVABLE back, and so you cannot change the battery or otherwise access the insides of the phone, without doing “things you shouldn’t be doing”. There’s also no strap loop, which I consider to be a useful inclusion on mobile phones.
    There also seems to be a connection problem with the phone, similar to the Iphone “death grip”, although the problem is intermittent, and isn’t as easy to happen as the Iphone issue.

    Personally, I think the phone is quite aesthetically pleasing, despite most professional reviews deeming it to be a bit ugly (including this article). It’s reminiscent of an Iphone, but the materials are clearly a lot cheaper. Still, I think it’s pretty tasty for a £200 phone.
    The Intel branding is a complete bragging-right as well, and I quite enjoy my friends exclaiming; “What?! An Intel phone?!” – These guys are mostly Iphone users too, so it must be pretty impressive for them to give a s**t.

    That’s all I can think about saying at the moment. I’ve still not fully explored the phone, but as a day-to-day user, I think it’s perfectly suitable for all but the most hardcore Android users, and (obviously) customers of other networks.

    My recommendation?
     - I’m not sure if it’s worth buying on PAYG, but if your contract with Orange needs renewing, or you’re searching for a new one, I’d choose this phone over all others (unless you could have an Iphone or the HTC One X etc, obviously). My contract is £20.50 p/month, with decent minutes, texts and data.

    Hope this gives you some insight to the device, thanks for reading (:

    • Anonymous

      Ah that’s updated,thanks. How do you feel about the lack of Android 4.0?

      • fahim5130

        abit of topic. But, should i get the arc s instead of it. Im on a budget of £200

        • Anonymous

          I’d go for the HTC One V over both of them. Android 4.0, very nice design build. About the same price.

    • http://www.facebook.com/john.field3 John JJ F

      briilliant phone this article doesnt give it justice i agree with you james

  • http://www.facebook.com/john.field3 John JJ F

    there is nothink wrong with this phone i couldnt give 2 ***** that it doesnt have 4.0 the android version its got it doing me absolutely phone if you wanna totally disrespect a phone and peoples work disrepect windows phone thats the mot boring phone ive ever had and trust me thats alot of phone ever since the first nokias i had a galaxy s 2 but had to get rid for financial reasons im absolutely 100% satisfied with this phone so sorry but i disagree with your review and espiecially your verdict 100%

Hot chat, right here!


Our most commented stories right now...