3 Pages
123

galaxy-nexus-1

Google, what the hell? Android Ice Cream Sandwich is an amazing, beautiful, sensible update, and the Galaxy Nexus has the most incredible screen I’ve ever seen on a phone. So why is the lock screen still so utterly idiotic?

I’ve been testing the Samsung Galaxy Nexus this week, and while my review is coming shortly, volume quirks aside it’s pretty damn amazing. So is Ice Cream Sandwich, except for one insane design flaw that’s driving me mad (Hence the rant).

I’m a stickler for security: I always lock my phone with a password of some form lest I lose it and someone roots through my email for all sorts of personal details. If you don’t, you’re doing it wrong.

You can imagine, then, that I was pretty pleased when Android 2.2 “Froyo” introduced a four digit pin lock a year and a half ago.

That’s all good and well, but it’s crippled by an unnecessary OK button in the bottom left hand corner, which you have to press every single time you type in your pin.

What on earth is the point in this OK button? Either you’ve got it right, or you’ve got it wrong. It’s not something I need to evaluate before I confirm – you can’t see the numbers you’ve just punched in anyway.

I’m loathe to bring up the “Apple did it better argument”, but in this case, it’s true. With an iPhone, you just type in the four digit code and it unlocks automatically. It’s one button less, but it’s scores of times a day, thousands of times a year. And it bugs me no end.

OK, I thought. Google’s signed Palm’s user interface guru Matias Duarte, and Ice Cream Sandwich was meant to be a huge user experience overhaul, right down to the font. Soon this stupidity would be done with, I figured.

Nope. Google just made it worse.

On the Samsung Galaxy Nexus, you still have to press OK, except the button’s been moved, so that’s a year’s worth of muscle memory that needs resetting. In its place now is a giant 0 button, as though your pin code is most likely to be composed of zeroes rather than, say, RANDOM.

Sure, it’s trivial, but it still leaves me with the feeling that the Android team isn’t quite in sync. Whoever designed the lock screen for Ice Cream Sandwich just moved the number pad around for the sake of it.

Actually, they didn’t do that, they buggered it up, then spent ages designing a stupid face unlock trick which didn’t work at the press conference, can be fooled by a photo, and isn’t as fast as entering a pin.

Thanks for that Google, time well spent.

Don’t get me wrong. Ice Cream Sandwich 4.0 is incredible: it feels mature. It feels finished. It almost all makes sense. It’s UI by attrition: gradually, Google is addressing all the issues that made Android once feel like a Fisher-Price toy, rather than the extraordinarily powerful operating system it really is.

But face unlocking is useless, and I can’t use a pattern lock because it’s slow and can be easily traced. So I’m stuck with a pin. A stupid pin ruined by a pointless OK button.

  • Lko

    Gotta say it looks pretty horrible.

  • http://twitter.com/mactoc1 mactoc

    Wp7 has failed 

    Star Sue

  • SamR

    That does look stupid and seems odd saying that the rest of the UI seems so polished. Probably not the sort of thing that will get enough people annoyed to prompt a fix either, so we’ll be stuck with it.

    I’m still confused why face unlock is “useless” though. If you lose your phone and someone finds it, they won’t have a photo of you and couldn’t get one. If someone steals the phone out of your pocket, they would have to be very quick thinking to turn around and take a photo of you otherwise the same applies.
    I suppose if someone breaks into your house, realises they need face unlock for the phone and then steals a photo too it’s a problem. 

    Otherwise it just doesn’t protect you from people you know, who would probably do nothing more malicious than update your Facebook status with something embarrassing. And, to be honest, I know most of my friends pins/unlock patterns anyway from watching them unlock their phones countless times!

    Although, I suppose it is more a gimmick than anything else. Why did the finger scanner of a previous Motorola phone (I forget which) never take off? It’s got the futuristic gimmick feel but is also secure, unless someone cuts off your finger, but then you’d probably have more to worry about than your phones security

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596771494 Matthew Lyons

    Yeah the OK button thing annoys me to the point where I occasionally consider removing the pin.
    What would be cool is if you could change the security depending on where you are e.g If I’m on my home WiFi the pin isn’t required, because it’s a pain to have to enter my pin every time I want to change a song or adjust the volume on my Sonos system when I’m at home safe and sound.

    • Anonymous

      You can do that Matthew, with Tasker. My screen lock turns off when I’m at my parents’ house in Ealing. Oddly, probably to do with high rise flats, it won’t work in my own place in south-east London, but that’s probably just as well since I’m more likely to get mugged their, and the transition isn’t instant as soon as you step foot out of the door.

  • Mark

    From videos on clove, face unlock is much faster than typing….

    • Anonymous

      It is three quarters of the time. The problem is the quarter when it doesn’t work, and then you have to put your pin in anyway. Great.

      • H V G

        its hardly effort to go from face unlock to pin

  • Phil Cole

    The reason for the OK button is that the pin (pre ICS anyway) doesn’t have to be 4 digits – it has to be at least 4 but can be any length.  This increases the pin security substantially as the thief needs to know the length of the pin code and the actual digits.

  • Anonymous

    “So why is the lock screen still so utterly idiotic?”
    Apple started the gimmick game with Siri..

    I mean really would ANYONE walk down the street talking to their personal assistants?  People with Bluetooth headsets still like like utter wankers, as do iPhone owners in general, talking to a Siri is even worse.

    • Anonymous

      That’s another argument entirely. The point here is that Android’s UI still needs a bit more common sense, not engineer sense.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=710717342 Mark Nichelson

    Why not just use the pattern unlock? 

  • Anonymous

    A sensible / reasonable rationale for having an OK option is to allow you to confirm final digit entry. You could argue why you’d need a delete button at all for pin entry using the same logic.

    Still, spot on as to why its a giant 0 there. Only guess I can hazard is to simulate a cashpoint keypad?

    Actually, now you got me started. Does the pin keypad have all the cruft? Symbols, letters, etc? Now that drives me nuts

  • Paul

    It may be annoying to You but it isn’t ‘crippled’. That is a bit of an over reaction.

    • http://www.kinectronic.com Kinectronic

      I couldn’t agree more. I don’t see how this “problem” stretches to over 500 words.

      Oh, and author, I’m not “doing it wrong.” I’m doing it the way I want to do it.

      I don’t have tons of personal information in my emails, and I can change my email passwords easily from a PC. 

    • http://www.kinectronic.com Kinectronic

      I couldn’t agree more. I don’t see how this “problem” stretches to over 500 words.

      Oh, and author, I’m not “doing it wrong.” I’m doing it the way I want to do it.

      I don’t have tons of personal information in my emails, and I can change my email passwords easily from a PC. 

  • Paul

    It may be annoying to You but it isn’t ‘crippled’. That is a bit of an over reaction.

  • H V G

    is it me or is the writer ‘completely stupid’

    that ok button is there because it doesnt limit the password to 4 characters or digits
    face unlock is just there for another method of security
    i think you should really lighten up

  • Slekkas

    I agree with the author. I hate that ok button. There should be an option to leave it or remove it.

    • Anonymous

      It just didn’t need to be there in the first place!

  • Syd_nth

    Agreed – AND the OK button is designed for right handed people.

  • Syd_nth

    Agreed – AND the OK button is designed for right handed people.

    • Anonymous

      Why the hell is there at all for a PIN? Daaar.

Hot chat, right here!


Our most commented stories right now...