Categories: TVs & Home Cinema Galleries   Tags: ,

Manufacturers have cracked how to make fairly low-cost 3D TV sets that use Active Shutter glasses to deliver the appropriate frames to each eye and simulate the desired 3D effect. Trouble is, every maufacturer has their own idea about how this should work and the glasses are not compatible with each other. What to do?

In cinemas, 3D films now use polarized glasses to direct  create the 3D effect, but this requires very bright projectors and is generally quite expensive to implement. Most home systems uses active shutters, where each lens is quickly blacked out and then cleared again in rapid succession. The shuttering is controlled by software to ensure it is properly synchronized and happens at exactly the right moment for the optical illusion to work.

The problem is that each TV manufacturer uses their own proprietary shuttering software. Each TV has its own type of glasses that can speak with the shuttering interface via a wireless signal so not only can owners of one set watch someone else’s TV it is difficult to make a ‘universal’ pair of 3D glasses that will work anywhere, so you are usually stuck with whatever design your TV maker decided upon.

Some universal designs exist, but they use undocumented methods to ‘fake’ synchronisation based on IR pulses from TV screens. There is also a problem with colour reproductions. Because each set reproduces colours onscreen in a slightly different way the glasses from some often use slight tints to automatically correct palette problems. It’s a mess, basically.

The Consumer Electronics Association is now working with manufacturers to create a standard for the emitters on 3D TV sets so that future sets will all use the same protocol to sync shutters.

“In an ideal world, emitters would migrate to this common specification, which would make for simpler glasses,” says the CEA’s Brian Markwalter, “We would then let the legacy stuff phase out of the market.”

TBC | £tbc | Consumer Electronics Association (via Wired)

  • Ampfan2

    6 months later and everyone STILL has their own proprietary protocol for 3d Glasses.
    7 at last count.
    Did the manufactures learn NOTHING from the Beta vs VHS wars? HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray?
    CD's were so succesful in their roll out because there was only ONE standard, unlike 3D TV.
    Sales of 3D TVs are non existant because people aren't willing to pay a premium price for something that isn't compatible with their friends or family hardware.
    We're not stupid. We'll just wait it out until there is ONE standard for 3D Glasses, or Apple and others come out with shutter free displays.
    And what's with this incompatible change in format for 3D. They could have done frame sequential 3D, that would have been backwardly compatible with the millions of existing TVs and players, but noo, They had to be greedy and make a new, incompatible standard to try to sell new hardware. Again, consumers aren't stupid. Chicken & egg. If you had brought out backwardly compatible 3D encoding, people would buy the media and glasses and eventually upgrade to full 3D TV and players. But greed is good. Greed killed the golden goose.
    Ampfan

Hot chat, right here!


Our most commented stories right now...