4 Pages
1234

windows phone 7 4

Yesterday we got hands on with a Windows Phone 7 prototype. The thing that the Windows Phone 7 seem to be most pleased with about with this phone is the design. But on getting a little hands on, we were baffled. The design looks great, really great, and the news that hubs can be created by developers restores confidence. However, there’s some crucial flaws with the Windows Phone 7 design, one of which struck me more than anything else.

The Windows Phone 7 design is bold, with beautiful clean sans serif fonts, made even sharper with scalable vector graphics, meaning that pinch and zoom never pixelates fonts. However, going for this bold, clean, minimal design has sacrificed a level of practicality that, on a day to day basis, is set to cause frustration for its users.

The screen we played with was about the same size, if not slightly bigger, than an iPhone screen. The Windows Phone 7 home page is good, with the cool blue tiles that display live data. But move beyond the home screen and there’s some great looking, but impractical interfaces, and it’s all down to those bold fonts.

So, for example, the Windows Phone 7 people hub, which pulls together all social networking and contact details into on searchable database, has its large hub title at the top of the screen. The text is two, maybe three cm tall, with the space underneath, and takes up around one quarter of the screen. It acts as a sort of scrolling indicator, so the amount the text (for the people hub it says ‘people’ at the top) moves as you scroll indicates the amount of content or number of pages there is to the right.

This movement is a nifty way of indicating content, but the space it takes up is ridiculous. Users do not need to see this title so big, and it means that the data Windows Phone 7 users do want to see is forced to be smaller to account for the minimal design.

The actual information, the names of contacts and authors of status updates being displayed are in roughly a font size 14, quite big, and easy to see. But the actual content of the status updates are tiny – maybe font size eight equivalent or smaller, and in a paler colour. This means that the actual information, the status updates that users want to read, is the smallest, tiniest portion of text on the page, with all the space given over to the great impractical scroller text at the top. The same is true of other Windows Phone 7 hubs, although is most prominent in the people and outlook hub, and there’s no option to change the size of this text.

With Windows Phone 7, Microsoft are going hard at a few key features, on of them being the look of the phones. But in the midst of scalable vector graphics and sexy sans serifs, it’s forgetting how important easy reading is on a small screen.

  • http://twitter.com/darkriderdesign Damon Sanchez

    I disagree, that the design is restrictive. If you take into account Windows Mobile1 launched in 2000, “any” mobile Interface that has come out since that date in some way was a restructuring of it's Interface. the designers of the iPhone and Droid had to start somewhere, even if they trying to separate themselves from Windows Mobile(version1-6.5)

    I click an icon, I get a list, I click an item in a list, I get a page.

    Take that linear process and couple it with Data Snacking a primary function of higher end mobile devices, and you get the common thread of Apple and Android Interface. The major flaw with both the iPhone and Droid is they have simplified their interface so much that it looks boring…(changing your wallpaper is design) the question is: at what point does “to much usability” become a visual hindrance?

    So Microsoft is going out on a limb and building the WIndows Phone 7 interface with the Designer in mind. A quick look at the interface reminds someone of high end design Magazine, Typography, Fonts, big graphics, Bold Colors.

    And again this is just the interface, the actual Operating system is really powerful. I'm buying one in the fall, my wife is buying one, my brother is buying one, and I'm pretty sure the company I work for will be upgrading to Windows Phone 7.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_436KEROMRTQD4KH4SUUHFTW5YQ Alan B

    ooops… not knowing the difference between a “serif” and “sans serif” font taints this review early on.

  • Lol

    This article is full of fail.

    • Jenniferlucyallan

      I'd like to get behind Windows Phone 7, but I've had the chance to get hands on with it, and I am just not convinced. It looks great, it really does, but it lacks practicality.

      • http://twitter.com/darkriderdesign Damon Sanchez

        But it is practical slim down your Over Head for launch, from a tactical perspective… Like Copy and Paste. Remember it's not just Copy and Paste it's in the idea that your leaving “Apps” open in the background…and then the ramifications of battery life… I'm upset about the Copy Paste to but I have no doubt this will be adjusted in some Os update.

        What I like about the approach Microsoft is taking lately seems to be a common thread in Windows 7 as well, instead of Bloating the Operating System with “Everything in the Universe” they are really sanding off that top layer of “stuff” that makes the operating system complicated, and leaving it up to the user. if you want Movie Maker, click a button and Wm7 will add Maker Maker but if your someone who will never use Movie Maker in your life, it's not there to muck up the experience. I could see them doing something like this in Windows Mobile 7. Dude if your in the 80% of mobile users who will never use Copy and Paste functionality, no harm done, if you do want the functionality, click a button and it will add the functionality to your Experience.

  • brio

    Call this a review?!!!! lol…

    What about the seamless integration of apps and functions?, Xbox Live, Office integration etc…

    • James Holland

      Hey Brio – Did we call it a review? I can't see that anywhere!

Hot chat, right here!


Our most commented stories right now...