Categories: Apps & Software News   Tags: , , ,

The iOS 4 update only arrived yesterday and the sound of moaning from fans of rival smartphones is already louder than a stadium full of vuvuzelas. The fact that some iPhone users have had issues with the iOS 4 update and hints of an iOS 4 app-ocalypse have only added to their cries. But once again Apple has managed one of its favourite magic tricks: making common features seem like major achievements. So how does it do it time and time again?

Imagine a phone with iPhone 4-like specs arriving three years ago with a 5MP camera, video recording, video conferencing, the ability to hook up a Bluetooth keyboard and a stable of apps that can power up your phone’s functionality. Nokia did. In 2007. It was called the N95 and it was, frankly, a bit of a clunker. The technical achievement didn’t count for much when the usability was lacking.

When the first generation iPhone arrived it was pitifully underpowered when you looked at the specs: a 2MP camera, standard GPS, no apps to speak of before Steve Jobs pulled the covers off the iTunes App Store a year later. But the combination of the original iPhone OS and the then pretty sleek hardware that made the package seem so appealing.

The arrival of iPhone OS 3.0 last year introduced cut, copy and paste, picture messaging and a phone search function. They were all familiar options to Windows Mobile, Blackberry, Symbian and Android phone owners but Apple offered up simple ways to make them work. When it comes to iPhone features, Apple is like Verbal Kint in the Usual Suspects, putting on a limp until it’s ready, then breaking into a run.

Putting iOS 4 and iPhone 4 in a battle against, say, the Nokia N8 and Symbian ^3 isn’t an even contest because Apple refuses to play by the mobile phone industry’s rules. It doesn’t sell the iPhone on specs but on experiences. That’s why it’s pitching FaceTime as the perfect way to connect with loved ones and not digging deep into video formats, codecs and other details that make most users want to pass out from boredom.

When a Blackberry owner shouts that they’ve been able to run multiple apps or change their homescreen background for years, Apple just shrugs. Its argument is that multitasking on other operating systems like the Blackberry OS or Android has always chugged through the battery life and being fairly fiddly besides. In theory, the limited multitasking in iOS 4 should avoid those issues.

There’s really two ways to look at the excitement directed towards iOS 4 by Apple fans. You could see it as like the gadget equivalent of Stockholm Syndrome: the iPhone hostages grateful to finally get the features already available to folk out in the free world. Or it’s a case of savvy smartphone owners picking a platform that only adds new elements when it knows they’ll work.

I’m tempted to plump for the latter. I’ve never been the sort of gadget buyer seduced by seriously packed spec sheets. Most of the time, the much-vaunted features highlighted in the press release don’t even get used. Unlike any other phone I’ve carried before, I can genuinely say my iPhone has made my life easier and iOS 4 will just add to that.

Am I wrong? Does Apple get too easy a ride with updates like iOS 4? Should features like multitasking have made their way into the OS long ago? Let us know…

Out now | £free | Apple

  • James Holland

    Couldn't agree more. I'm still using my iPhone 3G until I grab an iPhone 4 later this week, and the simple addition of digital zoom had me cooing like a newlywed. It didn't matter that the pictures were grainier than a British beach… it was just something very slick, and faultless. And yes, I know almost every other cameraphone in the world has zoom.

    • bensillis

      I've just scrolled to the left on the taskbar for the first time. Yay for track controls. Although they were easy to summon before anyway….

  • zunjine

    Many people fail to grasp this point and you make it very well. Steven Fry, the avoid gadget freak and Apple fanman (much prefer to fanboy/fanboi) made a very good observation at the launch of the iPad which I'll paraphrase here.

    He said that if you love your car and you enjoy driving it the chances are it's not because of the specifications of the engine or how many horse power it has 'under the hood'. You love it because of how it makes you feel when you drive it. The experience and the finish. The feel.

    As so often he makes complete sense. There's no point talking to me about spec. I don't care about spec. If my iPhone was powered by a hamster on prozac but worked like a dream I'd be just as happy. Human beings are not spreadsheets. We're not happy when our columns add up right. We're happy for far more nuanced reasons. Basic economics; if you can make people happy, you can make money.

  • Adriantiger

    I think that the apple-community is based on stupid people who doesn't care what other companies do, but only what apple do.
    They doesn't know what 12MPx mean, they know only that the iPhone 5MPx is the best cam on the world, because Steve said that. And when your IQ is something like 40-60, you believe at all. That's the reason because Apple will (and should) never change.

    • Vincent

      You got a point but think about it for a sec: All those stupid users your mentioning have been using APPLE products since who knows and they will tell you one thing: ITS RELIABLE and makes things EASIER TO DO. Average users look for 2 things, which I just mentioned. So why wouldnt they follow apple's lead if at the end of the day, they can be happy of what they have and sleep well on it. So maybe they have low IQ and think that 5MP is something to be amazed about, but tell me now: WHO ELSE DO THEY HAVE TO TURN TO TO TELL THEM OTHERWISE? No one. Thats where Apple holds them by the balls.

      • Djherceg

        More to the point: if you have enough to afford a Mercedes or BMW then why even bother looking at other cars and brands, say like Opel Insignia? Most will just stick with the brand they recognize as reliable. On the other hand, I do not want to spit $800 for a new phone each year :)

  • Vincent

    I agree with you that Apple has been messing around with the average user and they're making a lot of money out of it. Its funny but it reminds me of Microsoft who used to release their OS with so many bugs, you were in no doubt OBLIGATED to update and follow their rules. Apple is doing the same but I don't know why because they are loosing users to JAILBREAK, who is offering so many things we used to only dream about on our phones. I hate mentioning it and I'm not afraid to show up at an apple store and say my iphone is hacked because Apple is simply not doing a good job to work with the user so that HIS PHONE (yes our phones, we bought them, they belong to US) should be customizable and ready to sit, role over, sleep and jump when we want them to. At the end, whatever is said, Apple will be a giant in the industry and make a lot of money and you know what, we're gonna shut up and take it like men.

    • Guest

      I can't believe people give Apple or any company such a hard time. No one is forcing us to buy Apple products. If you think you can make a better phone then go ahead. Don't complain. If you like another phone better, buy that one. We can't force Apple to make what we want. Apple or any other company will make what they think is best and then we can choose between them. I would say that the reason so many people have chosen Apple is because their products do JUST WORK. Everyone I know is very happy with their iPhone and Apple products in general. Not just because of what Steve Jobs says, but because they work so nicely. I would say that the few disgruntled ones out there like yourself are a small minority.

      • Bazcom2k

        Look its not about them making stuff that you don't like, and you going somewhere else. Fact is, you cant!!! Why? Because even if you avoid apple, the industry wont, and where apple leads everyone follows as is plainly obvious. Other companies a following the same model, technologically and business-wise. The problem is that they too are making the same mistakes, following blindly without sitting to think “IS THIS ACTUALLY A GOOD THING?”.
        windows 7 is one of the few to move beyond that and i'd be glad to see more like that.

        Its one thing making a good easy to use UI and having a solid ecosystem between your products, its another thing cutting out standards, strong arming your way through unfairly with vague patents and copyrights, and spouting falsehoods to Joe public that don't know better.

        so yes, apple does get an easy ride, and yes the rest of us should complain and rant against them or else we can all kiss healthy competition goodbye. its just a shame alot of you just accept what you're given.

        • bensillis

          Windows 7 moves beyond it? Really? I'd say it's a lazy and uncompetitive OS, but then so is OS X. We need some serious innovation on the desktop.

    • Krypton15

      I couldn't agree more.. iPhone fanboys just believe to what Steve Jobs is saying.. If Steve said that it is new (ex. cut/copy & paste, like it has been 5 years ago), fanboys will agree to that and believed that it is revolutionary, as if it is their own invention.. Fanboys do not care about that feature since iPhone 3G do not have that feature but when it has been introduce to iPhone 3Gs, thay said that they want it now badly.. how lame.. hehehe! Also, if fanboys do not want the features of other manufacturers, why do they have to jailbreak everything just to make it work in iPhone? Isn't it ironic?

      • George

        Hey, second mouse button would be nice on Macs :) But they'll probably market it as a technology breakthrough somewhere around 2020.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Kyoraki Sam Sales

    Apple =/= Technology company.

    What Apple ARE nowadays is a business company, who seem to enjoy enticing the less mass market with products that have features and hardware that were the standard 5-10 years ago. The only reason why they can make minor features seem like major achievements is because the features should have been implemented at launch, but Apple made people wait and pay for costly upgrades, making them even more money. I can already see Apple bringing out a iPad ver.2 next year that will allow users to access parts of the file system and re-name files.
    Pity then, that this model won't last forever. As more and more people become tech savvy, they will see what a con Apple have become and switch. Stuff like Google's digital music comparison search seems to be adding fuel to the fire as well.

  • http://www.facebook.com/andrey.novikov Andrey Novikov

    Well to my understanding the gap between Apple and has closed. Apple does not have the advantage left neither in design nor specs nor in the interface. It's not like 2 years ago – when they presented their iPhone – the competitors where far behind. Now we've got dosen of phones that surpass apple's – and the number is growing.
    It will be i think just like with macintosh – apple showed cool product – but than blown the market. Or like Xerox.

    • George

      BUT everyone instantly recognizes Apple and iPhone and we all know that they work without glitches. On the other hand, how can you tell which of the following – Nokia N8 or N900 or C6 or C5 or X6 – have the features that compare to the iPhone's? It's just confusing. Several operating systems, different kinds of touch (or not) screens etc. Nokia should probably introduce the nPhone 1, 2, 3 and 4 and forget about complicated product names. What do you think?

Hot chat, right here!


Our most commented stories right now...