Facebook privacy settings will be simplified within weeks according to one of the social network’s senior executives. Facebook has taken a battering recently over its baffling number of privacy settings and it seems it’s getting ready to backtrack…

In a US radio interview about the Facebook privacy problems, Tim Sparapani, Facebook’s chief of public policy, said: “We are going to be providing options for users who want simplistic bands of privacy that they can choose from and I think we will see that in the next couple of weeks.”

New features like the Facebook Like button which reveal personal information to other sites have rankled users who don’t agree with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg’s claim that “privacy is no longer a social norm”. In December when Facebook made lots of information visible by default, Zuckerberg also turned most of his own profile public.

The current Facebook privacy controls run to 50 settings with over 170 individual options to choose from. Despite the complexity, Sparapani defended them claiming Facebook “should be getting credit for giving tools in the first place”. He said that in comparison other companies offer almost “no privacy settings at all”.

He also did some cheerleading for the Facebook Like button and Open Graph, which allows external sites to show personalised versions to Facebook users, saying: “This is an extraordinary gift to the public.”

That seems like a big claim. While those Facebook features are undoubtedly helpful to some users, they’re also all about expanding the social network’s dominance.

What do you make of this development in the Facebook privacy row? What changes does Facebook need to make?

Out now | £free | Facebook (via Wired)

  • MJ

    It’s remarks like ‘should be getting credit’ and the ‘gift’ comment that are angering people I think. It honestly comes across as extremely arrogant, why on earth should we be grateful for having hundreds of settings to sift through to protect details that should be private as default.

    This opt out mentality is awful, remember how everyone was shocked at having to opt out of that Phorm business? Can’t see how this is any different in principle.

    I refuse to use Facebook because of the privacy issue (much to the disgruntlement of friends, constantly asking me to join), I really don’t want random people looking at details, even with the privacy settings on, they still get ‘some’ info.

    Can’t see how they will be able to get away with this for much longer, there’s going to be a backlash at some point, probably when it’s too late and some big event happens where their privacy settings are to blame (huge loss of data, government style, or something more serious).

  • Alex Garcia

    Where is Tim Sparapani Facebook profile???? I can’t find it.
    Why is he rejecting all these gifts? Maybe he is just all talk like most Facebook executives.
    They all adore Facebook features but none of them use it. They love to share with the world but their profiles are locked down.

  • http://psoug.org Mike

Hot chat, right here!


Our most commented stories right now...