The digital economy bill spawned from the government’s Digital Britain report has passed the crucial third reading in the House of Commons, meaning it is now likely to be passed into law. Several last minutes changes have been made though, including a change to rules on tackling piracy.

The controversial digital economy bill was passed by 189 votes to 47 at the third reading late last night, but not without some changes. The key provision that ISPs would have to notify subscribers of alleged copyright infringements remains however: if alleged pirates continue, ISPs will then implement technical measures such as traffic shaping, slow speeds or account suspension, rather than total disconnection. ISPs that fail to do so can be fined up to £250,000.

But Labour has been forced to make compromises to pass the bill through the House before Parliament is dissolved in the run up to the election. Broad powers to block infringing sites through clause 18 have now been shifted to an amendment in clause 8, which allows for the secretary of state for business to order the blocking of a “location on the internet which the court is satisfied has been, is being or is likely to be used for or in connection with an activity that infringes copyright.”

Clauses giving greater power to broadcasting watchdog Ofcom have also been dropped, along with plans to enable a replacement of ITV regional news bulletins across the country. In a separate finance bill, the proposal for the 50p monthly landline tax to achieve a minimum 2Mbps broadband speed nationwide has also been dropped.

The digital economy bill will now go to the House of Lords, where peers will vote on the new amendments before it is passed into law.

Out TBC | £TBC | Parliament Publications (Via Paid Content)

  • http://www.rosslawley.co.uk/ Ross

    For me it was a real eye opener into the political process, I emailed my MP who wrote me a letter back saying he also had concerns – but not enough to turn up for the vote!

    Also, what was disturbing was the total lack of knowledge about the subject matter on the part of the MPs – not surprising I suppose, they pay for committees of ‘experts’ in the first place to help form the laws, its just a shame that committee wasn’t terribly balanced or had a wider range of understanding.

    I wonder if Google or YouTube will ever be taken off the web for copyright infringements or it will be smaller aggregates like newsnow that suffer. Also, I feel sorry for the ISPs, all the smaller ones will have a huge change in costs and will force them out of business. Which will make an oligopoly of large ISPs that will then have even more control on the market.

    Its a bad day for internet users most of whom are ignorant of the potential ramifications of the bill.

  • John R

    @Ross, I have to agree with you. I’m in Ireland, but have been watching this bill as it trundles along to being passed. I’m sure that it will also have ramifications for the ISP’s here too.
    Irelands’ biggest ISP, Eircom, has already blocked access to the pirate bay simply by blocking the URL. This was the Irish Music Rights Org. that brought Eircom to court to prevent the illegal downloading of music.
    The landscape will change with the passing of this bill, & the Irish ISP’s will follow suit!

Hot chat, right here!


Our most commented stories right now...