Steve Jobs continued his tour of media organisations to promote the Apple iPad with an Adobe-Flash-slamming appearance at the Wall Street Journal. Reports suggest Jobs fired off a volley in his continuing war with Adobe. Adobe slammed Apple for letting down iPhone users earlier this week.

Jobs popped up at the Wall Street Journal last month to persuade it that it didn’t need Flash and should focused on creating content for the Apple iPad.

Jobs allegedly repeated his attack on Adobe Flash from a recent Apple town hall meeting, claiming Flash is responsible for most crashes on Macs.

He went even further calling Flash a “CPU hog”, “a source of security holes” and a dying technology. Jobs said Apple doesn’t “spend a lot of energy on old technology”. He went on to compare Flash to other systems Apple got people to ditch like floppy disks.

Not only that but Jobs claimed that the Apple iPad’s 10 hour battery life would be battered if Flash was included, shrinking to a pitiful 1.5 hours. Given that playing constant video will hammer the iPad’s battery life anyway, that seems like a stretch.

Jobs apparently suggested that it would be “trivial” for the Wall Street Journal to ditch Flash. He suggested that it could switch to H.264 format videos which is supported by the iPad and Flash Player.

We’re not sure if Jobs mentioned that H.264 is patented and privately licensed. It also doesn’t have a system for easily creating interactive graphics which is a major requirement for most newspaper websites.

It seems the Apple vs Adobe grudge match is not likely to end any time soon. Adobe has a system for converting Flash apps to iPad and iPhone compatible versions but users are still looking for Flash on their iPhones.

What’s bugging us most is this: did Steve Jobs wear his funny hat to meet the Wall Street Journal?

Due late-March | £TBC | Apple (via Gawker)

  • CJ84

    All of the above may be true, but the fact that it is widely used across the internet as a web graphics standard is reason enough to include it in your software. HTML 5 may be the future but hardly anyone uses it yet. Flash is here and now and it should be supported.

  • drewandy

    ‘Greedy, insecure and old’!
    Yup thats Apple!!

  • Mark Lambert

    CJ84 hit it on the head. A lot of people are buying into Jobs’ rhetoric because they are on an anti-Flash crusade. Fact is, at this time a device without any kind of Flash support option is limiting. If it is really so important for Jobs to kill Flash, maybe Apple should buy Adobe and shut them down. In the meantime it feels a lot to me that average users are being used in a technocrat war here. “For their own good” of course.

Hot chat, right here!


Our most commented stories right now...