Sony PSPgo review Sony PSPgo review

ratingratingratingratingrating
Categories: Gaming Reviews   Tags: ,
We love
Smaller than the old PSP
We hate
Cramped design, downloads cost more than UMDs
Verdict
A nice idea, but the PSPgo is a flimsy gadget let down by high prices for its download-only games
Launch Price
£225
3 Pages
123

Sony PSPgo

The Sony PSPgo was one of 2009′s most-rumoured gadgets before its official unveiling at E3 in LA back in June. Now it’s here at last. So does its UMD-free frame live up to the hype? Or is this a pricey alternative to the ageing PSP-3000? Read our complete PSPgo review now and we’ll give you our tuppence worth.

Pick up the PSPgo and the differences between it and the last-gen PSP-3000 are clear. The UMD drive is gone, replaced with 16GB of internal storage for stashing games downloaded direct from the PlayStation Store. The 3.8-inch screen is a stunner and its 43 per cent lighter than the older model.

It all makes for an experience more on a par with the Nintendo DS than the bulkier old PSP. There’s something reassuring about physical buttons on a handheld hub and in that respect, the PSPgo does not disappoint. We played Gran Turismo PSP and found it far more enjoyable than driving games on the touchscreen iPhone. If you’re a hardcore gamer, such details are essential.


Read our Sony PSP-3000 review now


That said, we found the gaming experience itself a tad cramped. You’ll soon find your hands are in an awkward position which does not compare well to the bigger PSP-3000. The d-pad and controls could do with being closer to the centre of the PSPgo. Instead they’re so near to the edge that your hands need a break every five minutes. This is a criticism we have with the Nintendo DSi as well, but it’s still an issue which makes gaming on the PSPgo difficult.

The problems don’t stop there. The build quality of the PSPgo feels incredibly cheap, just like the PSP-3000. For a gadget that costs £225, it’s shameful. Although the slide mechanism works with a reassuring thunk, the shoulder buttons feel loose to the point of falling off and the plastic casing feels like it will shatter with just the smallest of drops.

Access to games has been the biggest issue surrounding the PSPgo’s launch. With no UMD drive, punters need to download all their titles. While we don’t have an issue with this per se, the 16GB of on board storage feels weedy, in spite of memory stick expansion. GT PSP takes up 3GB of space, meaning getting any more than 5 big titles on the PSPgo is a struggle. Memory sticks help, but a larger hard drive would have helped no end.

Downloading games is easy as. Just head to the PlayStation Network on the XMB and head in. The games available are vast and excellent. James Pond 2 for £3.99 is a steal, but newer titles are prohibitively expensive. Football Manager 2010 costs £29.99 on the PlayStation Store. That compares to £17.99 for the UMD on Amazon. The download process though is swift and payment is easy.

In terms of added extras, Skype access is a winner and the browser is handy. However typing takes ages to get used to. If the rumoured touchscreen version had been launched, it would have been far easier. As it is, this is a gaming device first, a web device second.

There’s no doubt the PSPgo has its advantages. Moving to downloads only is a bold move, but games should at least be reduced to match their UMD cousins. Compared to the Nintendo DSi, the PSPgo is on a par, with games aimed at more hardcore users. However, if you want a PSP, we’d still recommend going for the older version.

No related stories.

  • Stewart

    I picked mine up on launch day, I am must say your review is very naive. The build quality is fantastic, you don’t even mention how much better the screen is compared to previous PSPs I also have an issue with your point that there will be lots of 3GB PSP games. There won’t it’s an exception. Everything else I have for my PSP weighs in about 600MB (meaning you can get about 50 or so games on there). PSP Minis are 20MB or so.

    You didn’t even mention the PSP GO’s game suspending feature (which is exclusive to GO), that provides ingame XMB.

    I can see how the Sony haters have a dilema here, they want to back Microsoft and their claims that Blu-Ray is not needed, and digital downloads are the way to go (they completely miss the point the because every PS3 has a HDD, it’s also best equipped to deal with this too), but this same point plays totally into the hands of the PSPGO.

    I am more than pleased with mine. It’s a substantial upgrade from my PSP2000, the controls are better laid out, and the game suspend is a great feature (worth the upgrade price alone).

    • http://www.electricpig.co.uk Joe Minihane

      Hi Stewart

      Thanks for your comments. I think the PSPgo has a lot of plus points, but it has to be said that it’s very expensive for what it is. I have to disagree with you on build quality. I think the PSPgo is extremely plasticky and should feel a lot sturdier for a gadget that costs £225.

      As I say in the review, I think digital downloads are a good move, but that the price is prohibitive in comparison to UMDs. As I’ve told you many times before, we’re not Sony haters (or anyone haters for that matter). I think the PSPgo as a concept has potential, but really could do with more space, especially as it’s aimed at hardcore gamers.

      Thanks for your comments, glad you’re enjoying your PSPgo.

      Joe

  • nick

    It is great for people who don’t own a psp already. Downloadable games are the future and sony knows that.

    • http://www.electricpig.co.uk Ben Sillis

      Sony’s on to something with downloadable only games, I agree. But this would have much been much smarter had the PSPgo been styled as a true sequel instead.

  • salim

    i want to take part in a contest

Get more recommendations - see all our Top 5 lists

Hot chat, right here!


Our most commented stories right now...