<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D3s DSLR official!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-dslr-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-dslr-official/</link>
	<description>The only tech you need</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karen T.</title>
		<link>http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-dslr-official/comment-page-1/#comment-38351</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electricpig.co.uk/?p=44605#comment-38351</guid>
		<description>@S. Smith and Joe: If you guys are part of the “pixel-race&quot; club, this isn&#039;t the camera for you. It&#039;s not the number but the quality, pixel size, and HOW they&#039;re processed. Do your research. Pixel-packing just for the sake of being able to claim 2,531 megapixels (yes I exaggerate to make a point) isn&#039;t what gets us the quality from these superb cameras. Yes it&#039;s still a 12.1MP sensor but the sensor was greatly refined to provide unbelievable low-light performance, faster speed, etc. It’s the first camera in the world that can work great at ISO 12,800, and the ISO can be further increased to an unheard-of 102,400! This is HUGE! This camera&#039;s 12.1 megapixels are large and gather light better than cameras with lots more megapixels. Have you seen test images at 12,800 ISO? I have. WOW. And do you really truly need 1080p in a &quot;still camera&quot;? If video is that important to you, then you need to get yourself a separate HD camcorder.  How about looking at the huge under-the-hood improvements over the D3 rather than complain that it still &quot;only&quot; has 12.1 mp, and only 720p video. Nikon put the bulk of the improvements where they count. So cut these people some slack - they came up with a fantastic &quot;D3 upgrade&quot; and it&#039;s more than enough to get THIS photographer to move up from my D300 now (which I’ll keep as another backup body) &quot;Crap&quot;, Joe? “Tremendous disappointment”, S. Smith? Not even close. Do your research before bashing a product. Then go get yourself a 24mp camera with an inferior processor and low-quality ISO sensitivity. And please upload your images so we can compare them with similar images, lighting, settings, etc. taken with the D3s. I&#039;d love to see them compared. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@S. Smith and Joe: If you guys are part of the “pixel-race&#8221; club, this isn&#8217;t the camera for you. It&#8217;s not the number but the quality, pixel size, and HOW they&#8217;re processed. Do your research. Pixel-packing just for the sake of being able to claim 2,531 megapixels (yes I exaggerate to make a point) isn&#8217;t what gets us the quality from these superb cameras. Yes it&#8217;s still a 12.1MP sensor but the sensor was greatly refined to provide unbelievable low-light performance, faster speed, etc. It’s the first camera in the world that can work great at ISO 12,800, and the ISO can be further increased to an unheard-of 102,400! This is HUGE! This camera&#8217;s 12.1 megapixels are large and gather light better than cameras with lots more megapixels. Have you seen test images at 12,800 ISO? I have. WOW. And do you really truly need 1080p in a &#8220;still camera&#8221;? If video is that important to you, then you need to get yourself a separate HD camcorder.  How about looking at the huge under-the-hood improvements over the D3 rather than complain that it still &#8220;only&#8221; has 12.1 mp, and only 720p video. Nikon put the bulk of the improvements where they count. So cut these people some slack &#8211; they came up with a fantastic &#8220;D3 upgrade&#8221; and it&#8217;s more than enough to get THIS photographer to move up from my D300 now (which I’ll keep as another backup body) &#8220;Crap&#8221;, Joe? “Tremendous disappointment”, S. Smith? Not even close. Do your research before bashing a product. Then go get yourself a 24mp camera with an inferior processor and low-quality ISO sensitivity. And please upload your images so we can compare them with similar images, lighting, settings, etc. taken with the D3s. I&#8217;d love to see them compared. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Sillis</title>
		<link>http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-dslr-official/comment-page-1/#comment-38003</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Sillis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electricpig.co.uk/?p=44605#comment-38003</guid>
		<description>Is HD video what you really want though in a DSLR? Genuinely interested to know, I&#039;ve still yet to be convinced it&#039;s a necessity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is HD video what you really want though in a DSLR? Genuinely interested to know, I&#8217;ve still yet to be convinced it&#8217;s a necessity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-dslr-official/comment-page-1/#comment-37918</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electricpig.co.uk/?p=44605#comment-37918</guid>
		<description>This is crap I was expecting them to release it but with more upgrades like 24 megs, 1080 dpi its not what I expected form Nikon. Im disappointed in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is crap I was expecting them to release it but with more upgrades like 24 megs, 1080 dpi its not what I expected form Nikon. Im disappointed in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s. smith</title>
		<link>http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-dslr-official/comment-page-1/#comment-37777</link>
		<dc:creator>s. smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electricpig.co.uk/?p=44605#comment-37777</guid>
		<description>&quot;Newly engineered for striking image fidelity and low-noise, optimizing pixel size and count in a 12.1-megapixel sensor to produce extraordinarily rich files.&quot;

***What a tremendous dissappointment that they are still trying to sell such low pix count in a professional camera.  This is not on my list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Newly engineered for striking image fidelity and low-noise, optimizing pixel size and count in a 12.1-megapixel sensor to produce extraordinarily rich files.&#8221;</p>
<p>***What a tremendous dissappointment that they are still trying to sell such low pix count in a professional camera.  This is not on my list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunchtime Lowdown: Nikon D3s, new Flip Mino HD &#124; Electricpig</title>
		<link>http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-dslr-official/comment-page-1/#comment-37627</link>
		<dc:creator>Lunchtime Lowdown: Nikon D3s, new Flip Mino HD &#124; Electricpig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electricpig.co.uk/?p=44605#comment-37627</guid>
		<description>[...] new gadgets got dished out this morning. First up, we saw the powerful, pricey Nikon D3s, with added HD video and an astonishing ISO range. That was followed by a new Flip Mino HD [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new gadgets got dished out this morning. First up, we saw the powerful, pricey Nikon D3s, with added HD video and an astonishing ISO range. That was followed by a new Flip Mino HD [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
