<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PS3 to get its backwards compatibility back?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/06/30/ps3-to-get-its-backwards-compatibility-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/06/30/ps3-to-get-its-backwards-compatibility-back/</link>
	<description>The only tech you need</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetalMickey</title>
		<link>http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/06/30/ps3-to-get-its-backwards-compatibility-back/comment-page-1/#comment-13555</link>
		<dc:creator>MetalMickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electricpig.co.uk/?p=29130#comment-13555</guid>
		<description>Who said anything about &quot; Sony would then choose to update its Emotion Engine software now&quot;

This is just a patent filing.  Even idiots realise patent filings almost always don&#039;t result in products, it&#039;s purely to protect IP, and to stop other people doing what you are doing.

There is nothing to support the fact that what this patent contains is anything new at all, it may even be a catchup patent that&#039;s only just been granted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said anything about &#8221; Sony would then choose to update its Emotion Engine software now&#8221;</p>
<p>This is just a patent filing.  Even idiots realise patent filings almost always don&#8217;t result in products, it&#8217;s purely to protect IP, and to stop other people doing what you are doing.</p>
<p>There is nothing to support the fact that what this patent contains is anything new at all, it may even be a catchup patent that&#8217;s only just been granted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Strachan</title>
		<link>http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/06/30/ps3-to-get-its-backwards-compatibility-back/comment-page-1/#comment-13531</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Strachan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electricpig.co.uk/?p=29130#comment-13531</guid>
		<description>MM: What is currently emulated is not as sophisticated as the proposal outlined in the new patent. 

You are correct in identifying the lack of Graphics Synthesizer as the reason for current models not having backwards compatibility - as stated in the article. 

You could question why Sony would then choose to update its Emotion Engine software now, if it already has a (partly) working software solution. Just because we don&#039;t know about a similar GS chip emulator doesn&#039;t mean it can&#039;t or won&#039;t happen. 

There&#039;s a limited number of reasons why Sony would want to emulate the Emotion Engine - backwards compatibility being the most obvious, and the potential to sell PS2 games through the PlayStation Store is a potential money spinner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MM: What is currently emulated is not as sophisticated as the proposal outlined in the new patent. </p>
<p>You are correct in identifying the lack of Graphics Synthesizer as the reason for current models not having backwards compatibility &#8211; as stated in the article. </p>
<p>You could question why Sony would then choose to update its Emotion Engine software now, if it already has a (partly) working software solution. Just because we don&#8217;t know about a similar GS chip emulator doesn&#8217;t mean it can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t happen. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a limited number of reasons why Sony would want to emulate the Emotion Engine &#8211; backwards compatibility being the most obvious, and the potential to sell PS2 games through the PlayStation Store is a potential money spinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetalMickey</title>
		<link>http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/06/30/ps3-to-get-its-backwards-compatibility-back/comment-page-1/#comment-13477</link>
		<dc:creator>MetalMickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electricpig.co.uk/?p=29130#comment-13477</guid>
		<description>This copy and paste &quot;news&quot; is what is wrong with the tech blogging community.  You have clueless writers, with no technical background copying and pasting fundamentally flawed articles from other sites, clueless that what they are posting it total tripe.

This &quot;news&quot; is flawed because it&#039;s a patent for software emulation of the PS2 Emotion Engine, which is ALREADY emulated in software in the Euro 60GB models, and because it&#039;s emulated in software it means ANY PS3 is also capable of emulating it.   The problem with PS2 software emulation is not the Emotion Engine, it&#039;s the Graphics Synthesiser chip (&quot;GS&quot;), which the Euro launch 60GB models had in hardware because its alot harder to emulate in software, and something this patent has nothing whatsoever to do with.

I really hope the Mirror read this comment and realise that ElectricPig is the wrong choice for the tech news reporting, as their reporters are clueless tech idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This copy and paste &#8220;news&#8221; is what is wrong with the tech blogging community.  You have clueless writers, with no technical background copying and pasting fundamentally flawed articles from other sites, clueless that what they are posting it total tripe.</p>
<p>This &#8220;news&#8221; is flawed because it&#8217;s a patent for software emulation of the PS2 Emotion Engine, which is ALREADY emulated in software in the Euro 60GB models, and because it&#8217;s emulated in software it means ANY PS3 is also capable of emulating it.   The problem with PS2 software emulation is not the Emotion Engine, it&#8217;s the Graphics Synthesiser chip (&#8220;GS&#8221;), which the Euro launch 60GB models had in hardware because its alot harder to emulate in software, and something this patent has nothing whatsoever to do with.</p>
<p>I really hope the Mirror read this comment and realise that ElectricPig is the wrong choice for the tech news reporting, as their reporters are clueless tech idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 4/13 queries in 0.143 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: cdn.electricpig.com.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.electricpig.co.uk @ 2012-02-11 10:26:57 -->
