The BBC should pay to help bring fibre optic, ultra-fast broadband to the whole of the country, according to a government peer. Looks like iPlayer could be coming at a price – read on for all the details.

The BBC should contribute to help bring fibre optic broadband to areas of the country not covered by either BT or Virgin‘s plans, the former head of Ofcom told Parliament’s business committee today.

Questioned on his recent Digital Britain report, Lord Carter said, “More and more people get their media from the internet and that usage is doubling every two years. Would the nation’s state-funded content provider [BBC] have a role in this? It would seem to me it would.”

Currently, only half of the UK population lives in areas where BT and Virgin plan to roll out ultra-fast fibre optic broadband, but to ask a content provider – even a state funded one like the BBC – to pay for a new distribution network could provoke uproar, and not just from the BBC.

So, a new broadband business model, or fibre optic folly? We doubt the BBC will be happy, so we’ll be following this one every step of the way.

Out TBC | £TBC | BBC (Via BBC News)

  • Catt231

    I don’t get why I the BBC license payer should pay for an upgrade to the network, I already pay Virgin to supply my broadband and the UK is miles behind counties like Japan already! And most people are getting ripped off for speeds they don’t get as it is!

  • http://www.gravatar.com James Holland

    The BBC has already spoken of installing servers in local exchanges to lighten the load of iPlayer (since it’s no longer true P2P) but that won’t speed up actual access. That’s down to the likes of BT and Virgin, who continue to fight over the same areas of the country. I’ve often wondered why they don’t branch out into areas the other has yet to reach, and then lease access back to their rival while they continue to expand into territory they already provide. The result would be 100% coverage much quicker, and once networked areas start overlapping a price war that will mean much better deals for customers too.

  • Ben Sillis

    Mad isn’t it? If someone doesn’t get me some proper fibre optic broadband soon, I’m going to dig up the road and do it myself!

  • BlahBlahBlah

    If the state is paying for it we shouldn’t be subsidising a couple of the big companies.
    If we’re paying it should be a public fibre optic network and private ISPs. Maybe we’ll see more diverse market of smaller ISPs instead of pumping money into BT because the shareholders keep voting against it.

Hot chat, right here!


Our most commented stories right now...